The anthropomorphic bias of those who would relegate marsupials to an inferior evolutionary status is most
apparent in their recourse to data on brain structure and behavior. Unlike humans and other placentals,
marsupials lack the corpus callosum, which facilitates inter-hemisphere transfer of data acquired through the
senses. Yet it cannot be inferred that marsupials are thus deprived of such function. Didelphis Virginiana, one
of the opossums, makes use of the anterior commissure, an adaptation that is also found in reptiles and
monotremes. Diprodontons, including kangaroos and koalas, supplement the anterior commissure with the
fasciculus aberrans. While the modes of neocortical interconnection may be diverse, the work of Johnson,
Heath and Jones points to the conclusion that, functionally speaking the cortices and neocortices of both
groups of mammals exhibit parallel connections. Parker also notes “a similar range of brain size to body weight
ratios and of neocortical expansion”.
Another stigma borne by marsupials is the consensus that they are less intelligent than placentals. Yet Williams
argues that, all else being equal, natural selection will favor instinctive over learned behavior as being more
biologically efficient and that it is the accidental death of the young that is the prime selective pressure for the
evolution of intelligence. Seen in this light, marsupials have a competitive edge; their gestation period is brief
and the young remain in the pouch for an extended period exposed only to those dangers which also affect the
mother. There they are directly exposed to the mother’s food supply and can observe her behavior at leisure.
Placentals, on the other hand, not only have a longer gestation period but, once their young are born, must
often leave while foraging. Such absences increase the risk of mortality and decrease the opportunity to learn.
Thus, among placentals, selection would favor the apparent intelligence in the young and protective behavior in
the mother.
Marsupials are not known to exhibit maternal protective behavior. In fact, Serventy has reported that frightened
female kangaroos will drop their pouch-young as they flee, drawing a predator’s attention to the less able
offspring while the adult escapes. This behavior, whether purposeful or accidental, instantaneously relieves the
female marsupial of the mechanical difficulties of pregnancy with which her placental counterpart would be
burdened, while marsupials can replace any lost young quickly. Thus, in the absence of any need for close
maternal supervision, sacrificing their offspring in this manner may well have been favored in selection. Pointing
to the absence of the “virtue” of maternal protectiveness in marsupials is an instance of how mistaken are those
theorists who see similarities with humans as marks of evolutionary sophistication.
According to the passage, which of the following favor(s) the development of intelligence as a trait of placental
mammals?
I. The need to leave their young while foraging
II. The comparatively great risk of accidental death of the young
III. The opportunity for the young to observe the mother at leisure
Section: Verbal Reasoning